Opposition Party leader, Palusalue Fa’apo II, has drilled the Human Rights Protection Party (H.R.P.P) for their apparent lack of cohesion in the absence of Prime Minister, Tuilaepa Sa’ilele Malielegaoi.

On Thursday while Prime Minister Tuilaepa was recovering from a foot injury, which hospitalised him on Wednesday night, Palusalue in Parliament pointed to what he described as the absence of a plan among H.R.P.P Ministers.

“What’s happening to your side?” Palusalue asked.

“You are all over the place, what happened?

Have you got no leader?”

Palusalue was responding to deputy Prime Minister, Fonotoe Pierre Lauofo, who said the Opposition leader and his party members are “the same as terrorists.”

The exchange took place during the second reading of the Counter Terrorism Bill 2014, tabled by the Minister of Police and Prisons, Sala Fata Pinati.

The Minister told Parliament that the Bill is critical in terms of Samoa’s preparations to host the Small Islands Development States (S.I.D.S) meeting later this year.

“The law is especially important for the protection of people coming over for S.I.D.S,” he said. Appointed by Prime Minister Tuilaepa, Minister Sala is the Chair of the Security committee.

The Minister also told Parliament that Acting Police Commissioner, Fauono Talalelei Tapu is a “good leader” and “warrior,” as well as the “Commander in Chief.”

On Thursday, the Minister said his aim was to distribute a copy of the “security plan” to all Members of Parliament.

“Why? It is my belief that this is the House of Samoa where things should be discussed in the open. There is nothing to hide; it should all be brought out in the open with the idea that (security) is a collective effort.

“So I’ve prepared a copy which I’ll hand to all the M.P.’s and Cabinet Ministers with the idea that you are all informed about the preparations by our sons and daughters whom we have entrusted with this task.”

Since last year, Sala said the meeting’s security Committee has been working with “Interpol, Australia, New Zealand, U.S.A” in terms of “sharing intelligence on potential targets.”

“If you would like me to read out everything (in this report), we would be here until the evening but if you want me to read just a bit…”

At that point, deputy Prime Minister Fonotoe interrupted, cautioning the Minister against revealing certain security details. “If the issue of security is in relation to S.I.D.S, can you ask your Commander in Chief one more time if it’s appropriate for these details to be revealed?”

Fonotoe said. “When it comes to security, (certain things) shouldn't be revealed in case terrorists get a hold of your list and then you might not be able to find your Commander in Chief.”

Speaker La’auli Leuatea Polata’ivao attempted to clarify the issue. “I think what the Minister wants to make public are public awareness programmes whereby our Parliament can assist in terms of security,” he said.

“But I know the Minister is holding on to confidential information.” When Sala returned to the floor, he said: “I think what the deputy Prime Minister is talking about are the troublemakers inside the House.

“There are no terrorists inside the House. For example, is Levaopolo a terrorist? Is Leala a leader of terrorists? Or Ifopo from Aiga i le tai? The answer is no.”

The Minister said there is no confidential information in the Bill and that it was all about preparations for S.I.D.S. He then proceeded to tell Parliament about the number of participants expected at the meeting when Palusalue intervened.

“I feel sorry for the Minister because the deputy Prime Minister doesn't seem to know the aim of the Ministry,” he said, adding that the Tautua Samoa Party supports the bill. Fonotoe though became unhappy.

“I totally understand what the Minister is trying to do,” Fonotoe responded. “We are talking about security and that’s in line with this bill. We are talking about protection from terrorists.

That’s what the Minister is trying to speak about and I’m advising him that there are parts that shouldn't be revealed to Palusalue and their side in case they know.” Fonotoe then compared Palusalue and the Tautua Party to terrorists.

“They are the same as terrorists. We don't want them to know these things. These things should only be revealed after the meeting.” The comparison did not sit well with Palusalue who demanded that the words be removed from Parliament records. The Opposition leader said Fonotoe’s comparison showed that he is “weak.” But Fonotoe was not done. “If you read the bill carefully,” he responded, “and you look at the meaning of the word terrorist, it doesn't just refer to people who detonate bombs. “It also includes people who create conflicts with words like what you are doing. So the word terrorist has a broad meaning and yet you’re only thinking about what we see on TV and the news.

“You are right because you’ve got no bombs but terrorists can use thoughts and conspire to defeat the other side. All those are terrorist activities.”

Speaker La’auli light-heartedly told Fonotoe not to use the word “terrorist” but use “tourist” instead. He invited Minister Sala to continue. “We are all the same, Samoa mo Samoa,” said Sala. “That’s why I’ve decided that you should be informed about what the government is doing.

“Since December last year, the Security Committee has been gathering information. We are working with Customs, Immigration, S.P.A, S.S.C, Marine… Health… everyone is in here,” he said referring to various government agencies including Samoa Ports Authority and the Samoa Shipping Corporation. The mention of Ministry of Health drew a reaction from the Minister of Health, Tuitama Dr. Leao Tuitama.

Said he: “What I want the House to be aware of is that these are not the only terrorist activities that could endanger the lives of people in an organisation, like this meeting. “Another terrorism method is secretly bringing diseases with the idea of spreading it among people in a public place. This is one of the areas the Ministry is looking at.

“These sort of terrorists don't care about anything; their only aim is to bring a disease to a public place so that people are affected by it.

The Minister of Finance, Faumuina Tiatia Liuga, also joined the debate. He said security plans have different levels.

He told Parliament there are also different classifications of security information to safeguard people from being attacked. Faumuina said part of his work in the past included devising security plans and offered to work with Minister Sala in terms of his security plan.

But Fonotoe returned to the floor, saying that both the Ministers of Health and Finance have confirmed what he was talking about in terms of terrorism methods.

“And the leader of the Opposition is sick so he is the leader of terrorists.”

Palusalue did not hold back. “Mr. Deputy Prime Minister, you are so rude,” he retorted. “I’m not a leader of terrorists. “The other thing is, (there are so many voices in your party) what’s happening to your side? You are all over the place, what happened?

Have you got no leader?”

Fonotoe would not hold back. “That’s not being rude,” he said. The deputy Prime Minister pointed out that Palusalue had breached Parliament Standing Orders by interrupting Minister Sala and that he was the one that was being rude.

Speaker La’auli attempted to calm things by urging Palusalue not to take the “terrorist” comment seriously, saying that it was merely a joke. But Palusalue was far from impressed.

He instead questioned the Speaker over Standing Orders saying that there was nothing there to stop anybody from intervening when a bill is being explained by a Minister.

Speaker La’auli disagreed. He said Palusalue was wrong. Earlier that day, Sala said security was a major issue in the world today.

“It is no secret that a lot of problems in terms of security have arisen,” he said. “Looking at the aircraft that’s gone missing (Malaysia Airline), we have to ask the question of why are there terrorists in this world, why do people hijack planes, why do they kidnap and demand ransom money?

Why do people conspire (to do wrong)?”

The Minister said the Counter Terrorism Bill 2014 and Trusts Bill 2014 “work together to stop people from bringing dirty money to Samoa.” He did not say how. About safety in general in Samoa, the Minister assured: “I can say that in Samoa, there are no terrorists, only good people.

“The only thing I know (is that sometimes) there is the selling of marijuana for a bottle of beer. When the seller is caught, he is jailed.”

The Minister, however, disagreed with suggestions that people sell marijuana because they are poor. “My observation is that this is a blessed country, a country where people go to church,” he said.

But there are times when “one’s mind is not right, then we see things like what’s happening in Ulutogia.”

The Ulutogia incident involved two men who were killed using a machete.

“There is so much evil,” said Sala.

“The truth is that, we all have our devils, even me. There are times when I’m tempted especially when I’m not happy and that’s when I say some nasty things.”

The second reading of the Counter Terrorism Bill 2014 was passed. Parliament resumes tomorrow.

Businesses could soon generate their own electricity with the Office of the Regulator exploring a policy designed to encourage private investment in renewable energy.

According to Regulator, Donnie de Freitas, options that are being explored to achieve this include Net Metering and use of double meters. Samoa’s proposed policy is still under discussion.

“It’s important to note that the Regulator has issued no policy, determination, or Order on net metering,” Mr. Defreitas said.

“The Regulator has made no determination on the price, quantity, rules or limits of any net metering program for Samoa. Rules for Net Metering are being developed.”

E.P.C. (Electric Power Corporation) has proposed to some companies to have all electricity generated sold to the grid, he said. Businesses would receive credit for the amount sold generally at a rate less than the cost of E.P.C. generating the same electricity using fuel.

“This would then be netted off against the electricity the customer would then receive for its consumption from the grid.

“This option requires two meters - one measuring the electricity being fed into E.P.C. grid, the other meter measuring the electricity being received by the customer from E.P.C.”

He again emphasised that such systems were still in the concept phase.

“The Regulator would consider all possible options including the two above but no policy, determination or Order has been made in this respect of this issue.”

He said in the interim, the Regulator accepts E.P.C. plans to consider two test cases using a two metering system, one of them being a local Church, the other a diplomatic mission.

“(The Church) is working with a third party who have a generation licence issued by the Office of the Regulator,” Mr Defreitas said.

“The proposed arrangement is that all electricity generated from (the Church) solar panels will be sold to E.P.C. at a feed in tariff which will be agreed to by both parties and subsequently approved by the Regulator.”

The Regulator said he understands that negotiations are ongoing between E.P.C. and the Church on this matter.

“In the future, the Regulator anticipates that the price paid for renewable generation from customers should never exceed the cost to E.P.C. for generating the same electricity using fuel.

“The intention is to ensure that other utility customers do not subsidise private renewable energy generators.

“The Regulator waits the outcome of these ongoing negotiations and will use them in finalising a position in this area.”

Mr Defreitas said before the E.P.C. could broaden the scope of its test cases the Regulator would first require the Corporation to file net metering standards for his consideration.

“Feedback from the pilot projects will assist E.P.C. in their submission on standards,” he said.

“At present, arrangements can be made between the Electric Power Corporation and its customers.

“A customer does not require regulatory approval for installation of renewable devices like solar panels; the issue is for the sale of excess power to E.P.C.

“The price paid by E.P.C. for the renewable generation is set by the Regulator.” In regards to legislation the Regulator said there are two types of licences under the Electricity Act. One is for Network and Services.

The other for Generation. “The legal implications for sale of electricity by persons other than Independent Power Producers, is an issue under consideration by the Office of the Regulator.

“This matter would be elaborated further in future determinations and possible Orders or Rules.

“The Regulator is seeking to develop and improve the regulatory framework rather than use loopholes.

“If there is need to change the regulatory framework to facilitate the sustainable development of the sector, the Regulator will then work with stakeholders to effect any necessary changes.”

Mr Defritas said in the future, the Regulator will require E.P.C. to demonstrate that renewable generation from customers is needed, and that renewable energy actually replaces diesel fuel used for traditional generation.

“If it is not actually useable by the utility, the Regulator does not want other customers to pay for it,” he said.

“There is a limit to the quantity of electricity that the E.P.C. system can receive from any one generation source, because this electricity is not stored, it must be used as soon as it is generated.

“In the case of Photo-Voltaic (P.V.) systems without storage there is a grid limitation of 20 per cent of noon peak demand. “The Regulator intends to work with E.P.C. to determine the appropriate limit for any net metering generation.

“The Regulator will also work with E.P.C. to determine the interoperability of the E.P.C. grid system. “It is essential that customer generated electricity meet standards for maintaining the viability of our distribution system.

“Other island states that have introduced net metering have found that the success of the programs depends on: sufficient un-met demand growth; appropriate pricing; adequate upward limits on the scope of the program; safety, reliability; and annual review of the results.

The Regulator said he would be in a better position to indicate a public timeframe for any implementation when the current review of the regulatory framework is completed in May 2014.

The United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission defines the term ‘net metering service’ as a service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by that electric consumer from an eligible on-site generating facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities.

“(It) may be used to offset electric energy provided by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period,” the F.E.R.C. says.

Local steaks are tough, Parliamentarians say.

But if local cattle farmers want their steaks to be tender, the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries, Le Mamea Ropati Mualia, has a very simple solution.

“The two most important things to do are to keep your cattle peaceful and select the appropriate grass to feed it with,” he said.

“Let’s remember that steaks are muscles. Now, think of the cattle as an athlete.

When an athlete trains too much, the muscles bulge out.

The cattle are like that. If you keep the cattle peaceful and feed it with good grass, when it comes the time to slaughter it, the steak will be tender.”

The Minister was speaking during the second reading of the Slaughter and Meat Supply Bill 2014, which proposes to set up a Slaughter House to certify meats for commercial use.

The Bill also proposes to introduce two Mobile Units to help farmers around the country slaughter their animals. During the debate, Falealili M.P., Tusa Misi Tupuola, raised a couple of questions.

“Our constituency has a lot of cattle farms but when I look at the bill and its implementation, there is only one Slaughter House and two mobile units,” he said.

“Please consider a plan appropriate for cattle farmers at Falealili and other constituencies in rural areas, so that their animals are slaughtered and the meat is preserved for its intended purposes.”

Tusa then drew attention to the Slaughter House’s opening hours. “On Sunday and national holidays, I notice that the office to certify meat will not be opened,” he said.

“Let’s consider that there are many different events held on Sundays in Samoa.

“There are also many special occasions during national holidays. It could create tension between villages and the Ministry. I’m talking about funerals and weddings...” Tusa also raised the issue about the quality of beef in Samoa.

“Vanuatu has very tender beef but we all know that in Samoa, regardless of whether the cattle is a baby, the meat is still tough,” he said.

“Why is this? Are we feeding them the correct grass? Is it because of the way they are being looked after by the farmers?”

Tusa told Parliament that many M.P.’s like their steaks “juicy and medium rare.”

“When we go to restaurants, most of us like our juicy and medium rare types but often when it is served, it is quite tough. Is the Ministry looking at ways to improve this?”

Salega M.P., Afualo Dr. Wood Salele said the Bill is long overdue. If it becomes law, it would assure consumers that the meat is safe.

“The reality now is that a lot of hotels are using imported meat from New Zealand,” he said. “Is this not the opportunity to use our own meat?

Tourists should be able to sample our beef in Samoa.” Le Mamea admitted that “a lot of our meat is tough.” But we are not the only country. The Minister said he has just returned from Mongolia where the beef was equally tough because the cattle there “are wild.” In contrast, beef in Israel is excellent and yet they are not grazed with grass.

“In fact there’s no grass but the meat is tender and the milk is wonderful.” The Minister said the difference is that “they are very well taught” as “oppose to ours where you spend all day chasing them down with a horse.”

As for Vanuatu beef, the Minister said: “Vanuatu has very good programmes for feeding and looking after their cattle farms.”

Speaker of the House, La’auli Leuatea Polata’ivao, said it is the chef’s job to ensure the steak is tender.

“Any meat that’s tough, it means the chef is not qualified to cook it,” he said. The Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Tuisugaletaua Sofara Aveau also joined the debate.

“That’s one of the roles of the slaughterhouse,” he said about making the beef tender.

“The house is where the animal will settle before it is slaughtered. The usual practise is that the cattle is rested for a day to allow it to settle.”

He added: “With most meats, the best time to consume it is between one year and a half and three years. In Samoa, he said “we care for them for so many years before they are used so by the time we get to them, we find that the meat is inappropriate because they were not meant to be for the market.”

Earlier, Faleata West M.P., Lealailepule Rimoni Aiafi, questioned the inclusion of the word “humane” in the bill.

“Humane, is not human,” Minister Le Mamea responded. “They’re different things. “You remember when some people slaughter an animal; you can hear it screaming as a result of the pain. That’s what you call inhumane. “When it’s humane, it’s a quick ending without the agonising pain.” The second reading of the Bill was passed.

Twelve new titleholders have been bestowed the chiefly title of Lauano yesterday at Leauva’a.

One of the high chiefs of the family, Va’ailalo Tauā reminded the new chiefs of their roles and their responsibilities within the family.

“We are so thankful that the Lauano family finally made it, it’s not easy, and always remember that one of your roles is looking after the family.”

“Fa’amatai is the key to governance and way of life in Samoan culture.”

“Inherent in the fa’amatai system is the welfare and well-being of the extended family (‘aiga) and the protection of family”

“May you all be blessed!”

Newly recognised, Lauano Nicky Vaiomanu said that it was a pleasure for him to become one of the matai within his father’s family.

“I feel very honoured, very privileged.”

All the new matais were well supported by their family. And it was that support that gives them strength.

“I am ready to serve my family, village and the church,” he said.

“I trust and believe in God that He is sufficient. “

“I just want to say a big fa’afetai tele lava to all my family and friends for their supports... and this is the first time I have gotten a matai title so I will use it wisely.”

He explained his understanding of the importance of matais within families.

“In the Samoan culture, the concept of serving and taking on the responsibility for the welfare of the family is integral to the fa’amatai system.”

Mrs Fia Sapolu Afamasaga who was one of the relatives attending yesterday shared her own thoughts about matai names.

“Each matai has a name (suafa) by and through which they exercise their rights in the family over which they preside.”

“Matai names are for the most part very old ones and are handed down from generation to generation and titles can be bestowed on one person or numerous family members who are distinguished from each other by their Christian names.”

“It is common for each ‘aiga to have a number of matai titles and the title of a family matai.”

Nesian Mystic arrived in the country on Friday for a one-off performance last night – but without a Samoan member of the band, who could not make it because of his “job.”

Speaking to two of the group during their rehearsal at the National University gymnasium, Te Awanui “Awa” Reeder and Donald “MC Oldwun” McNulty said that “it was a very happy moment for the group to be here in the country for the very first time.”

Said Donald, “There are six of us now and the Samoan guy didn’t come because of his job but hopefully he will join us in the next trip.” He did not specify what the job was. That member, Feleti “Sabre” Strickson-Pua, posted a comment on his personal Facebook profile on Friday stating that he was “Excited to be able to share details of the first of many shows this year at the start of next week. Pencil in Thursday 24th of April details to follow as well as announcing the new band name.”

Members of the band have made no secret of their intention to pursue solo careers and indeed media stories stating as much go back years. Meantime, remaining members of the band are happy that they finally made it. Awa admitted that, “It took ages for us to come here in Samoa”

“An opportunity for us as a group was something that we all have to remember and cherish, and coming to Samoa was awesome even though this is my second time but the beauty of its surroundings still remain,” he said.

“Everyone was looking forward to come to Samoa and I am really happy with it..I mean everyone does.”

“Our group formed in 1999 and we are all classmates, we are like family - just what Polynesian people are brought up with.” He also expressed his thanks for being able to represent their group, to thank the sponsors and especially the help from Lole Usoali’i for always being with them.

“When we were called to come to Samoa, it was the greatest moment of my life... it was good.”

“I love it,” he enthused “Because we are from different island countries so we decide on different styles according to how our people used to live, sing and enjoying themselves day by day.

“Because of different circumstances that is why it took us long to come to Samoa but...yep we really enjoy our time here but we really want to come back again to Sa..” It’s “sad we had only three days.”

A Tongan son in the group, Donald said that he visited Samoa last September and went to Savai’i.

“I am Tongan but I always want to come to Samoa and as one of the group, Samoa gives me a lot of energy in my career.”

“The backgrounds of our group members united a remarkable diversity of Polynesia “The group name was formed up from one of Bob Marley’s album ‘Mystic’ and the Nesian is the last six letters of the word Polynesian, because we are all from Poly’s islands country.”

“We all want to come back - hopefully for the Teuila Festival.”

“Samoa, thank you for your support that makes us move forward in our careers.”

“All the best.”

They performed at the N.U.S. Gym last night. The group will be leaving Samoa tomorrow tonight.

The Aleisa Sasa’e Congregational Christian Church Parish dedicated its new Temple and Hall, “Satauro o le Ola”, yesterday morning. The ceremony was well-attended by church ministers, parish members, relatives, and members of the public.

 

 

 

 

Top to bottom : Aleisa Sasae. Parish Minister, Rev. Apisaloma Taeleipu and his wife, Ulimasao Elisara Taeleipu; Sufali Fata Likisone, Taulesulu Malifa as Taupou, and Aso Fata Tanu; Papaliitele Ioane Malietoa, Mrs Papalii Alofa and Faaeamalo Faamausili Maualaivao;  Angie Papali’i Poloa, Papali’i Poloa, Rev. Faapaia Tariu and Sina Tariu ; Rev. Larry Tafaeono, Litera Solomona, Lupe Anesone.

Love is patient.

For four years, Taranaki Seiuli and Mighty Taiulu had to go through the usual challenges of courtship before they could consider the next step in their relationship – marriage.

And so yesterday, they said their “I do’s” promising to love and cherish one another through health or sickness.

They exchanged vows at the Saanapu-uta Congregational Christian Church with close family and friends surrounding the couple.

The service was followed by a congratulatory celebration organised by Church youths before the newlyweds and their bridal party headed to the brides’ home at Saanapu to celebrate their union as husband and wife in style.

The bride Taranaki is the daughter of Rasela and Eneliko Seiuli of Saanapu and Falelima and her groom Mighty is the son of Litia and Fereti Taiulu of Sapapali’i and Satapuala.

Taranaki and Mighty will be based at Piula Theological College following their wedding.

Mr Taiulu is currently a Methodist Theological Student.

Prior to their marriage, Mrs Taiulu was the Information Management Officer at the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP).

The couple’s bestman and maid of honour were Mene Li’a Matafeo and Julie Ulu.

They had 22 bridesmaids and groomsmen.

The Museum hosted a night to talk about the power of poetry, the call of the forests, the stir of climate change and the reminder of cultural heritage on Friday evening.

Guest speakers included Dr. Leasiolagi Malama Meleisea, Reverend Ruperake Petaia and Fa’ainu Latu.

“When Lumepa contacted me for this presentation I couldn’t quite make the connection of poetry as important as a Museum Talk about the subject of climate change or global warming,” said Reverend Petaia.

“Actually the mention of the world museum connotes antiquity and a thing of the past so to speak, and I believe climate is neither exactly a thing of the past nor is it a display of historic moment to be admired now or even as we conjure up nightmares about a very unlikely future of utopianism.”

However Nicholas Smith in a write up on the subject of poems about global warming suggested that poetry is a creative way of expressing feelings about a variety of topics, including global warming.”

“I believe a scientist/expert of the topic shall be speaking later on in the programme, on the more technical scientific definition of global warming and particularly its undesirable effects on our physical environment.”

“I am just a poet and a Faifeau (writer/ servant), so I’ll concentrate on the emotional and perhaps the spiritual, the abstraction of thoughts and inner feeling of the soul and the hearts of human beings as experienced by poets, about the effects of human activity on our environment, the rain and the rainbows, sunshine, moonlight, twinkling stars, the air we breathe that labours behind the scene, to enrich the soils that all life so much depends.

“As quoted in their invitation, Robert Louis Stevenson said that ‘It is not so much for its beauty that the forest makes a claim upon men’s hearts, as for that subtle something, that quality of air that emanation from old trees, that so wonderfully changes and renews a weary spirit.’

Mr. Fa’ainu Latu also spoke on the effects of climate change in the world and its impact on the Pacific including Samoa.

“Prophecies and the prophetic” was the subject of an eight-day seminar at Togafu’afu’a last week. Held at the Apia Harvest Centre Church, the seminar was organised by the Apia Harvest Centre Bible College and conducted by Pastor and Prophet, Les Dowie and his wife, Pastor Lorraine Dowie, of New Zealand.

The first part of the seminar was opened to all denominations. But three days were specifically dedicated to Pastors and Reverends of the Assemblies of God in Samoa and American Samoa. Among the participants was Reverend Elder George Mageo.

Both Pastor Les and Lorraine were born in Australia and have grown up within the Pentecostal Church. In 1974, they said God clearly directed them to move to New Zealand where they trained at the Christian Life Bible College in Wellington, then went on to pastor churches in the Hawkes Bay, Wellington and Auckland.

Pastor Les was a member of the Executive leadership of the NZ Assemblies of God for eight years. He has been a member of the Associated Pentecostal Churches, NZ for 14 years, six of which as Secretary.

Pastor Les Dowie says the functions of the Prophetic ministry, as part of the five-fold ministry, which should operate hand-in-hand so that the church is edified, are among the most underutilised gifts in the church.

In the book of Ephesians, Pastor Les points out that Jesus Christ gave the church prophets and teachers.

Like all Ministries in the church, the Prophetic ministry is there to “build up the church and bring glory to God.”

“However there is often a lack of understanding of the Bible concerning the function, purpose and outworking of the prophetic in the church,” Pastor Les says.

This is the result of “fear, cynicism, lack of knowledge, lack of sensitivity, secularism and ever increasing pressures to tolerate sin.”

The seminars during the past eight days were well attended by members of different churches.

It will culminate with a final service at the Apia Harvest Centre Church today, starting at 9:30am.

Prime Minister Tuilaepa Sailele Malielegaoi flew out of the country last night for medical treatment in New Zealand.

He left the hospital at 4pm to get ready for a flight at 10pm last night.

Dr. Ailao Imo confirmed that the Prime Minister is being sent to New Zealand but cannot give any more details because he is bound by “doctor patient confidentiality.”

He has given his report to the National Health Service General Manager Leota Lamositele Laki Sio, but Leota could not be contacted for comment.

Transferral of Tuilaepa to New Zealand comes after earlier assurances that there Tuilaepa was doing “very well” and would be back at work after a night in the country’s Intensive Care Unit.

Last week, sources told news media that Tuilaepa had stood on a nail while looking at renovations at a house of a family member.

On Saturday, another family member said that Tuilaepa was okay, but that his wife had told him to stay in hospital and get some rest.

Tuilaepa’s health first came to the attention of the public last Wedneday when he was in Parliament night and asked for a sheet, and a tshirt, to cover himself from the cold. Soon afterwards, he was assisted from Parliament and taken to hospital, where he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Government officials stayed silent about Tuilaepa’s condition until Friday, when The Chief Executive Officer of the Prime Minister's Office, Vaosa Epa, said that Tuilaepa's condition was “never” lifethreatening. She expected him to be back at work this week.

Ms. Epa told Radio New Zealand International that the Prime Minister ‘just needs rest’, after an extremely busy week in Parliament.

Government officials did not return calls to local media seeking comment on Tuilaepa.

This followed claims from ministers in Parliament denying Tuilaepa had any health problems and was away from the House on “short visits”.

Attempts to get comments from government yesterday were unsuccessful.

Samoa Tourism Authority Chief Executive Officer Papali’i Sonya Hunter has rejected criticism from a “rebel” tourism group that the country’s marketing and promotion campaigns are failing the industry.

Papali’i has also rejected claims that a visitor survey shows a quarter of all properties have been without guests for a whole year. “The ones they referred to as having a zero percentages are those property accommodations that, say for example, had been affected by the tsunami and no one was actually staying there, for example, Vavau Beach Fale, I mean that was taken out several years ago in 2009,” she told Radio Australia in an interview.

“Some of those other ones included – how would you call it – an accommodation at a university and, you know, anyone who knows how to read statistics would actually look at it and know why there’s a zero zero, if they know the product well.”

The report did not clarify why the properties had been included in the survey. Papali’i was responding to comments from Samoa For Real spokeswoman Nannette Sass, who earlier told Radio Australia they had been called “the rebel group” for criticising national marketing and promotion programmes. Ms. Sass, a consultant for the International Finance Corporation and a former chief executive officer for Samoa Hotel Association as well as the Samoa Chamber of Commerce, said the visitor survey showed real cause for concern.

“What is reflected in the figures is that something is dramatically not right, or drastically not right as far as our promotional activities and marketing of Samoa,”

Thirty of the 120 properties listed did not register at all with visitors surveyed. Ms. Sass suggested that “perhaps we really need to look at regrouping and going back to the drawing board and trying to address the issue of what is Samoa as a destination and what are its unique selling propositions and from there look at strategically developing that plan.” However Papali’i did not accept her credentials for making comment. “Well, I don’t know what she was referring to because she’s not from the tourism industry and I don’t know if we can refer to her as a Samoa tourism expert,” said Papali’i, referring to Ms. Sass. “All I can I say is that all I would like to know is, you know, what it is they were referring to.”

She said that while 28 percent of visitors stayed in private homes, the majority stayed in commercial properties. Papali’i’s response drew criticism online last week.

“To imply that someone ( Nynette Sass in this case) is not in the tourism industry, and is therefore not qualified to comment on tourism-related issues, is arrogant and full of self-righteousness!” said one industry source on Facebook.

“STA does not own the tourism industry in Samoa...and sooner they get the message that tourism is "everybody's business" the sooner they get it right... maybe!! Rest of the interview is the usual waffling & blah blah blah....” Asked whether government realised there is a problem, Ms. Sass said that, “Well, to be quite honest, I think that is part of the problem, that we’re not recognising as a country that those properties do not have people in them.”

During discussions last year between Samoa For Real and the government, they pointed out that there were many properties that did not have any tourists. Some closed down for half the year because they couldn’t afford to keep staff because there was nobody there, she said.

“And the result of that was that we were told we were ‘the rebels’ and that we were unnecessarily raising concerns that were not there.” Ms. Sass said that as long as that attitude remains “and we can’t collectively acknowledge that there is a problem then we won’t be able to address the problem and the issue that we are in now.” Papali’i said that the stories about “zero” visitors at some properties showed that some people do not know how to read statistics.

The full interview transcripts are published below. Nynette Sass: “What is reflected in the figures is that something is dramatically not right, or drastically not right as far as our promotional activities and marketing of Samoa. And that perhaps we really need to look at regrouping and going back to the drawing board and trying to address the issue of what is Samoa as a destination and what are its unique selling propositions and from there look at strategically developing that plan.”

Q. Could the problem be that there are too many tourism accommodation providers in Samoa – that there’s too much supply and not enough demand? “That’s a possibility, that’s a possibility. But the thing is that the government of the day has also been encouraging a lot of the local investors to build accommodation and this was around 2007 or prior to the games, the South Pacific Games that was hosted in Samoa, so everyone went out and started investing in hotels.”

Q. Well, Samoa has got everything that every other Pacific destination has, wonderful beaches, beautiful warm seas to swim in and snorkel in, tropical rain forests, friendly people, what’s the problem with marketing Samoa outside?

“Yeah, um, (chuckles), I think again like I said, it’s coming and regrouping and really looking at those areas that are special to Samoa. As you just said, every other South Pacific island has exactly what we are offering, but from the research that has been done, it’s always pointed towards the people being very friendly, and that’s one of the unique selling points that I guess we could promote.”

Q. So you’re suggesting using Samoan culture as like a unique selling point that makes Samoa different from Fiji, Cook Islands, Niue and Vanuatu? “Absolutely, absolutely.”

Q. Then why isn’t this being done then? Obviously if a quarter of all accommodation providers have had no one staying with them for 12 months, clearly the government must be aware that something is very wrong?

“Well, to be quite honest, I think that is part of the problem, that we’re not recognising as a country that those properties do not have people in them. Because this is where the discussions arose last year between our group, Samoa For Real group, and the proposal that we put to the government.

We pointed out to them that there were so many properties that did not have any tourists and some even closed down for half the year because they couldn’t afford to keep staff and running an operation because there was nobody there, and the result of that was that we were told we were ‘the rebels’ and that we were unnecessarily raising concerns that were not there and as long as that is there and we can’t collectively acknowledge that there is a problem then we won’t be able to address the problem and the issue that we are in now.”

Q. So is the problem that Samoa is just not marketing itself correctly, and if so, whose responsibility is it to change the strategic thinking in the way that Samoa puts itself forward as a tourism destination?

“For starters, the destination marketing, that is the role of the national tourism organisation, in our case that is the Samoa Tourism Authority, and I guess there is not enough effort being put behind promoting Samoa as that cultural destination.”

Q. So you think it’s really the government body’s responsibility?

What about the private sector, what about your group Samoa For Real, and perhaps other tourism operators getting together and launching their own marketing campaign – nothing to stop you? “Yeah, that’s the reason why Samoa For Real came together, it’s looking at collectively putting that effort by the private sector to look at collective marketing, collective bargaining, but at the end of the day it can’t just be the Samoa For Real, or just the national tourism organisation doing the marketing.

The marketing really has to come from everybody, all the stakeholders need to agree that this is the type of thing that we’re going to promote, and then once the destination marketing and promotion has been done by the tourism authority, the rest of the operators and other players and stakeholders can tag along and promote the same things.” Papali’i Sonya Hunter:

“Everyone was truly satisfied and the tourism products that they sought aside from the accommodations where they stayed at the main sort of attractions that they felt was the pristine environment and also you know there is a lot of comments about the beauty of Samoa.

Some of the others included friendly people as well as you know the cuisine part that they felt was really good. Also the overall experience, and the culture. The culture and the environment made the difference.

Q. These days with South Pacific travel destinations, countries have got to differentiate themselves because anyone can go anywhere for beaches and palm trees and little drinks with umbrellas in them, but they’ve got to offer something special.

This group that Nannette Sass was representing Samoa For Real was saying that Samoa is not really marketing itself with a focus on what is special to Samoa – it’s trying to compete with everyone on offering the same sort of thing – is that justified?

“Well, I don’t know what she was referring to because she’s not from the tourism industry and I don’t know if we can refer to her as a Samoa tourism expert.

All I can I say is that all I would like to know is, you know, what it is they were referring to. We can try and differentiate ourselves as much as possible through our culture and our environment and our people. The beaches actually featured highly in our visitors survey. Whilst we discount the fact that everyone in the Pacific has a beach, the fact is that there are different kinds of beaches.

Our beaches and lagoons are quite pristine, but its actually added with the difference in the destination is our culture and our own inclusiveness, you know, um, and that’s what people refer to as friendliness and we utilise that a lot in our marketing by saying this is the Samoan experience – you cannot find that anywhere else.”

Q. But what about this aspect of the report which seemed to say that a quarter of the country’s accommodation providers had no visitors staying at all – was that simply not the case or how would they have misinterpreted that sort of statistic?

“Um, if you look at the report it actually says that 28 per cent of all tourists stayed in a private home.

So that would make up for our visiting friends and relatives, but also 72 per cent actually stayed in commercial accommodation, hotels, bed and breakfast etcetera, now the reason why they have said that is because, um, in the back in our annexes, we actually give the full information on who answered that, where they had stayed etcetera and we listed all the accommodation and so there are percentages and the thing is that with the 4,400 people we actually interviewed, they actually showed that they did stay in commercial accommodations but the ones they referred to as having a zero percentages are those property accommodations that, say for example, had been affected by the tsunami and no one was actually staying there, for example, Vavau Beach Fale, I mean that was taken out several years ago in 2009.

Some of those other ones included – how would you call it – an accommodation at a university and, you know, anyone who knows how to read statistics would actually look at it and know why there’s a zero zero if they know the product well.”

Ua faamāmā-sagia e le ta’ita’i o le Itu Agai, Palusalue Faapo II, le Vaega Faa-Upufai e Puipuia Aia Tatau a Tagata (H.R.P.P.)ona o lo latou lē magafagafa lelei a’o to’esea le Palemia, Tuillaepa Sailele Malielegaoi.

Ua faamāmā-sagia e le ta’ita’i o le Itu Agai, Palusalue Faapo II, le Vaega Faa-Upufai e Puipuia Aia Tatau a Tagata (H.R.P.P.)ona o lo latou lē magafagafa lelei a’o to’esea le Palemia, Tuillaepa Sailele Malielegaoi.

O le Aso Tofi a’o tau maua se malosi o le Palemia mai se manu’a i lona vae, lea na tuuina atu o ia i le falema’i i le po o le Aso Lulu, sa faasino atu e Palusalue i totonu o le Palemene se mea na ia faamatalaina e foliga i le to’esea o se ata faataatia i le va o Minisita o le H.R.P.P.

“O le a le mea ua tupu i latou outou itu?”o le fesili lea a Palusalue.

“Ua taape solou outou, o le a le mea ua tupu?

Ua leai so outou ta’ita’i?”

O le tali atu lea a Palusalue i le sui Palemia o Fonotoe Pierre Lauofo, o ia lea na fai mai o le ta’ita’i o le itu agai ma sui o lana vaega ua “tusa pau lava ma tagata faatupu faalavelave.”

O lea feupua’iga na tula’i mai a’o faagasolo le faitauga lona lua o le Tulafono Tau Faaofi o le Tete’e Atu i Faiga Faatupu Faalavelave 2014, lea na faataatia i le laulau-a-fono a le Palemene e le Minisita o Leoleo ma Falepuipui, o Sala Fata Pinati. Sa faailoa atu e le Minisita i le Palemene e faapea e matua taua tele le Tulafono Tau Faaofi i le itu i tapenaga a Samoa e talimalo i le fono i taimi faai’u o lenei tausaga a Setete Tau Ati A’e o Atumotu Laiti.

“ E faapitoa le taua o le tulafono mo le puipuia o tagata e o mai mo le fono a le S.I.D.S.,” o lana faaaliga lea. Na tofia e le Palemia o Tuilaepa le Minisita o Sala e avea ma Ta’ita’ifono o le Komiti Tau le Puipuiga.

Sa faailoa atu foi e le Minisita i le Palemene e faapea o le Sui Komesina o Leoleo, Fauono Talalelei Tapu o se “ta’ita’i lelei: ma o se “toa”, faapea foi ma lona avea ma “Pule Aoao o Fuafuaga Uma”.

O le Aso Tofi na fai mai ai le Minisita o lona faamoemoe o le tufatufa atu lea o ata o le “fuafuaga tau le puiuiga” i Sui Usufono uma o le Palemene.

“Aisea?

O lo’u talitonuga o le Maota lenei o Samoa e tatau ona talanoa ai faalaua’itele mea.

E leai se mea e tatau ona natia, e tatau ona avatu uma i fafo i le malamalama ma le faamoemoe e faapea o le (puipuiga) o le galuega fai faatasi lea a tagata uma.

“O le mea lea ua ‘ou saunia ai se ata lea o le a ‘ou tuuina atu i Faipule uma ma Minisita o le Kapeneta ma le faamoemoe o le a outou silafia uma ai tapenaga a outou alo ma fanau ia ua matou tuuina atu i ai le faatuatuaga mo le faatinoina o le galuega.

”Talu mai le tausaga talu ai, fai mai Sala sa galulue le Komiti Tau le Puipuiga ma le Komiti a le “Interpol e aofia ai Ausetalia, Niu Sila ma Amerila e fefaasoaa’i o latou tomai e uiga i faiga o loo fuafua e fai.”

“Afai la tou te finagalo ou te faitauina atu mea uma (o i totonu o lenei lipoti), o lona uiga e o’o lava i le afiafia o tatou iinei, ae afai tou te finagalo ou te lauina atu na o sina vaega.”

O le taimi lea na faalava ai loa le sui Palemia o Fonotoe, ma fautuaina le Minisita e ‘aua ne’i faaalia nisi o auiliiliga tau le puipuiga.

“Afai o le mataupu tau le puipuiga e faasino i le S.I.D.S., e mafai ona e toe fesili tasi i lau Pule Aoao o Faatonuga pe talafeagai ona faailoa ai nei faamatalaga auiliili,?” o le faaaliga lea a Fonotoe.

“A pa’ia loa le mataupu tau puipuiga, (o isi mea) e lē tatau ona faailoa atu ina ne’i maua e tagata faatupu faalavelave lau lisi ona lē mafai lea ona e maua lau Pule Aoao o Faatonuga.”

Sa taumafai le Fofoga Fetalai o Laauli Leuatea Polataivao e faamanino le mataupu.

“Masalo o mana’o le Minisita e faalauiloa faalaua’itele a tatou polokalema mo le silafia e le atunuu ae mafai ona fesoasoani i ai le Palemene i le itu tau le puipuiga,” o lana faaaliga lea.

“Ae ou te iloa o loo taofi pea e le Minisita faamatalaga e lē faalaua’iteleina.”

Ina ua toe saunoa Sala, fai mai a ia: “Ou te manatu o le mea lea e fai mai ai le sui Palemia o tagata faatupu faalavelave ia o lo i totonu o le Maota.

“E leai ni tagata faatupu faalavelave o i totonu o le Maota. Mo se faata’ita’iga, o Levaopolo o se faatupu faalavelave?

O Leala o se ta’ita’i o tagata faatupu faalavelave? Poo Ifopo mai le Aiga i le Tai? O le tali e “leai”.

Fai mai le Miisita e leai ni faamatalaga faalilolilo o i totonu o le Tulafono Tau Faaofi ma ua na o faamatalaga uma lava e uiga i tapenaga mo le S.I.D.S.

Ona faaauau ai lea ma faailoa atu i le Palemene le aofai o i latou ua faamoemoe e auai mai i lea fono ma o le taimi lea na faauilavea ai loa Palusalue.

“Ou te alofa i le Minisita ona e foliga mai e le o iloa e le sui Palemia le faamoemoe o le Matagaluega,” o lana faaaliga lea, ma toe faailoa atu e lalolago e le Tautua Samoa Party le tulafono tau faaofi.

O le taimi lea ua amata ona lē fiafia Fonotoe. “Ou te matua malamalama lelei i le mea o loo taumafai le Minisita e fai,” o le tali lea a Fonotoe.

“O lea tatou te talanoa i le puiupuiga ma ua talafeagai lelei ma lenei tulafono tau faaofi.

O lea matou te talanoa atu i le puipuiga mai tagata faatupu faalavelave.

O le mea tonu lena o loo saunoa i ai le Minisita ma out e fautuaina o ia e faapea o loo i ai vaega e lē tatau ona faailoa atu faalaua’itele ia Palusalue ma le latou itu ina ne’i o latou iloa.”

Ona faatusa lea e Fonotoe Palusalue ma le Tautua Party i tagata faatupu faalavelave.

“E tusa pau lava latou ma tagata faatupu faalavelave. Matou te le loto ia iloa e i latou nei mea.

O mea nei e faatoa tatau ona faailoa atu pe a mae’a le fono.”

O lea faatusatusga sa lē talia lelei e Palusalue ma o le pogai lea na ia talosagaina ai le aveeseina o ia upu mai faamaumauga a le Palemene.

Fai mai le ta’ita’i o le Itu Agai o le faatusatusa a Fonotoe ua iloa ai lona “vaivai.” Ae sa lē ma taofia ai Fonotoe.

“Ana e faitau lelei i le tulafono tau faaofi,”o lana tali lea, “ma e tilotilo i le uiga o le upu terorisi, e lē faapito i tagata faapa-pomu.

“E aofia ai foi tagata e faatupuina faalavelave e ala i faaupuga e pei o le mea lea e te faia.

O le upu la ‘terorisi’ e lautele lona uiga ae o lea e te mafaufau lava na o mea o loo tatou vaaia i le Televise ma tala fou.

“E sa’o oe ona e leai ni au pomu ae mafai e tagata faatupu faalavelave ona faaaoga o latou mafaufauga ma ma fuafua e faato’ilalo le isi itu.

O na mea uma o gaoioiga faaterorisi.” Sa faaoloooloma’au le Fofoga Fetalai o Laauli ia Fonotoe ina ia ‘aua le faaaogaina le upu “terorisi” ae faaaoga le upu “turisi”.

Na tapā le Minisita o Sala e faaauau lana saunoaga.

“E tutusa uma lava tatou, Samoa mo Samoa,”o le faaaliga lea a Sala.

“O le pogai lena ua tonu ai ia te au e tatau ona faailoa atu ia te outou le mea o loo fai e le malo.

“Talu mai Tesema o le tausaga talu ai, sa aoao mai e le Komiti o le Puipuiga faamatalaga.

O loo matou galulue ma le Ofisa o le Tiute, Femalagaiga, SPA, S.S.C. Gataifale..Soifua Maloloina..,ma ua aofia ai tagata uma iinei,” o lana faaaliga lea ma ta’ua le tele o vaega sooupu a le malo e aofia ai le Pulega o Taulaga a Samoa ma le Faalapotopotoga o Vaa a Samoa. .

O le ta’ua o le Matagaluega o le Soifua Maloloina na faate’ia ai le Minisita o le Soifua Maloloina Dr. Leao Tuitama.

Fai mai a ia: “O le mea ou te mana‘o ia malamalama i ai le Maota e lē ona pau ia o gaoioiga a tagata faatupu faalavelave e ono lamatia ai soifua o tagata o loo i totonu o se faalapotopotoga e pei o lenei fonotaga.

“Ole isi faiga faa-terorisi o le aumai faalilolilo lea o faama’i ma le faamoemoe e pisia ai tagata o i totonu o se nofoaga faitele.

O se tasi lenei o vaega e tatau ona silasila i ai le Matagaluega.

“O nei ituaiga o tagata faatupu faalavelave e le popole i soo se mea; pau lava lo latou faamoemoe ia aumai se faama’i i se nofoaga faitele ina ia pisia ai tagata.

Sa auai foi le Minisita o Tupe, Faumuina Tiatia Liuga i le felafoa’iga.

Fai mai a ia o fuafuaga tau le puipuiga e eseese o latou tapulaa.

Na ia faailoa atu i le Palemene e i ai foi faatulagaga eseese o faamatalaga tau puipuiga e puipui malu ai tagata mai le ono osofa’ia.

Fai mai Faumuina o se vaega o lana galuega i aso ua mavae sa aofia ai le fuafuaina o fuafuaga tau le puipuiiga ma ofo atu e galulue ma le Minisita o Sala i le itu i lana fuafuaga tau le puipuiga.

Ae na toe tula’i Fonotoe ma faailoa atu e faapea ua faamaonia e Minisita e to’alua o le Soifua Maloloina ma Tupe le mataupu sa talanoa atu ai e uiga i fuaitau o faiga tau faatupu faalavelave.

“Ma o le ta’ita’i o le Itu Agai e gasegase ma o ia o le ta’ita’i o tagata faatupu faalavelave.”

E le’i toe faatali Palusalue. “Lau Afioga i le Sui Palemia, ua matuā e lē mafaufau na’ua,”o lana tali atu lea.

“E lē o a’u o se ta’ita’i o tagata faatupu faalavelave.

“O le isi mea, (ua tele na’ua leo i totonu o la outou pati) jo le a le mea ua tupu i la outou itu?

Ua outou alu faasoloatoa, o le a le mea ua tupu? Ua leai so outou ta’ita’i?”

E lē mafai lava ona taofia Fonotoe. “E lē o se lē mafaufau,” o lana faaaliga lea. Sa faailoa atu e le sui Palemia e faapea ua soli e Palusalue Tulafono Tumau a le Palemene ona ia le tagata e lē o mafaufau.

Sa taumafai le Fofoga Fetalai o Laauli e faato’ato’a le mataupu e ala i le una’ia o Palusalue ina ia ‘aua ne’i mamafa ia te ia le mataupu tau “terorisi”ma fai mai ua na o se mea ula lava.

Peita’i, sa aliali mai e le o talia e Palusalue.

O lea na ia fesiligia ai le Fofoga Fetalai e uiga i Tulafono Tumau ma fai atu e leai lava se mea o i ai e taofia ai soo se tagata mai le faauilavea pe afai o faamalamalama e se Minisita se tulafono tau faaofi.

E le’i talia e le Fofoga Fetalai o Laauli. Fai mai ai e sese Palusalue. I le amataga o lea aso, fai mai Sala o le puipuiga o se mataupu tele lea i le lalolagi i aso nei.

“E lē o po se lilo o loo tele faafitauli tau le puipuiga ua aliali mai,” o lana faaaliga lea.

“A tilotilo i le vaalele lea na leiloa (Vaalele Meleisia), ona tatou fesili lea pe o le a le pogai o le i ai o tagata faatupu faalavelave i le lalolagi, aisea e ave faamalosi ai e tagata vaalele, aisea latou t eave faa-gaoi ai tagata ma tāpā se taui tupe?

Aisea e taupulepule ai tagata (e fai se mea sese)?” Fai mai le Minisita o le Tulafono Tau Faaofi e Tete’e Atu a ii Faiga Faatupu Faalavelave 2014 ma le Tulafono Tau Faaofi o Tupe Tausi 2014 “o le galulue faatasi e taofi tagata mai le aumai o tupe eleelea i Samoa.”

Na te le’i ta’ua pe faapefea ona faatino lea tulaga. E uiga i le saogalemau lautele i totonu o Samoa, fai mai le ta’utinoga a le Minisita: “E mafai ona ‘ou fai atu e faapea i totonu o Samoa, e leai ni tagata faatupu faalavelave, e na o tagata lelei.

“Pau o le mea ua ‘ou iloa (e faapea i nisi taimi) j o loo faatau atu marijuana mo se fagu pia.

A maua le o loo faatauina atu, e falepuipui.” Ae ui o lea, na teena e le Minisita manatu e faapea e faatau e tagata marijuana ona ua matitiva.

“O la’u vaaia e faapea o se atunuu faamanuiaina lenei, o se atunuu e o tagata i lotu,” o lana faaaliga lea.

Ae i ai lava taimi “e lē sa’o ai le mafaufau o se tagata, ona tatou vaaia loa lea o mea e pei o le mea na tupu i Ulutogia.”

O le faalavelave i Ulutogia na aafia ai ni alii se to’aluaj ia na fasiotia i se agaese. “Ua matua tele na’ua mea leaga,” o le faaaliga lea a Sala.

“O le mea moni e faapea, e tofu lava le tagata ma lana tevolo, e o’o lava ia te a’u. E i ai taimi e faaosoosoina ai a’u aemaise ai lava pe a ‘ou lē fiafia ma o le taimi lena out e tautala ai i mea leaga”.

Na pasia le faitauga lona lua o le Tulafono Tau Faaofi e Tete’e Atu Ai i Faiga Faatupu Faalavelave 2014. E toe tauaofia taeao le Palemene.

Tautua party whip Lealailepule Rimoni Aiafi is questioning the power of the Public Service Commission (P.S.C) to veto decisions made by panels for Assistant Chief Executive Officer (ACEO) posts.

He believes that P.S.C. and the chairman overturning decisions already made by a panel is an “insult” to these people.

“It is insulting the integrity that includes high profile CEO’s and senior staff.” Panels include representatives of P.S.C, yet the decision still is overturned, said the opposition whip.

He is also alleging that this is an unusual practise. Lealailepule alleges that this practise is recent, since the appointment of Tu’u’u Dr Ieti Taulealo as P.S.C. Chairman.

Although the Commission has the legal right to overturn decisions made by a panel under the P.S.C. Act Lealailepule believes an amendment is necessary.

He questions “where the fairness is” in this power by the P.S.C to overturn panel decisions. He claims that the Commission has been given too much power and authority under the P.S.C. Act.

The matter was first raised by Lealailepule on Wednesday during the Samoa Tautua party’s weekly press conference.

But he spoke further on the matter in a follow up interview with this newspaper.

Lealailepule said that Tautua has been approached by members the public including those who have been affected greatly by the commission veto powers.

He said the latest example is an appointment to Statistics.

It is an “abuse of power under regulations – it should be amended because that part of the act doesn’t produce fairness and balance.

“It’s giving P.S.C. total power - full power granted to them under the act to appoint people without giving the department people the opportunity to appeal.

Lealailepule said this happening too often.

Veto decisions were often in favour of those living outside Samoa.

Applicants and those removed from their post should be given the right to appeal such decisions, he said.

“Currently those in these situations don’t have the right to appeal.

“They should have that right to know why they have been removed from their post and the right to appeal such decisions.”

The commission constantly promotes transparency and accountability but lacks those same qualities around its own appointment processes, he said.

Many of those losing their jobs have served many years of service. Qualifying for a job shouldn’t just depend on educational qualifications but also merit and experience, he said.

A joint Independent Corporate Review and Mid-term Review of the Strategic Plan for the largest regional organisation in Samoa, the Secretariat for the Pacific Regional Environmental Programme, commenced last week.

Thisfollowstheannouncement of the successful bidder for the regional tender - John E Hay and Associates Ltd. Professor Hay is well known to the region as a Pacific based academic with over 40 years of relevant experience, including as team leader of the first Independent Corporate Review in 2008 and as the current Regional Adviser for the Strategy for Climate and Disaster Resilient Development in the Pacific, which will come into effect in 2016.

The review will broadly assess the organisation's performance over the last five years, including implementation of the Strategic Plan and whether current priorities and targets are still relevant.

The review will also help guide the ongoing implementation of the plan to 2015, and development of the next Strategic Plan.

Professor Hay's team members are highly experienced specialists from throughout the Pacific region and include Ms. Teresa Manarangi-Trott, Deputy Team Leader, a Cook Islands based consultant and Director of Pacific Consultants Ltd;

Ms. Sivia Qoro, a Fiji based consultant with extensive consultancy experience in external evaluations; and Mr. William Kostka, a consultant from Federated States of Micronesia, who is also the Executive Director of the Micronesia Conservation Trust and a member of the Micronesia Challenge Steering Committee.

The review will be guided by a Reference Group of SPREP members and undertaken in a consultative manner with SPREP members, partners, donors and staff, through an open and transparent process.

The review approach will include a major regional workshop with SPREP members in Fiji from 12 - 14 May, 2014.

The final review reports will be presented to the 25th Annual SPREP Meeting to be held from 30 September to 3 October, 2014.

At a recent World Bank conference, the Pacific company registry reforms including Samoa were held up as the most progressive and advanced in the world.

“Progress on secured transaction reform has been outstanding in the Pacific” said Michael Broshanan, Operations Manager for the Market Services Group at the New Zealand Companies Office, in an item published on the New Zealand Aid Programme website.

A case in point is the Solomon Islands which has had an online companies registry for over two years.

It used to take up to three months to start a company in the Solomons; now it takes just 1.5 days. In the last year Solomon Islands has moved up 39 places in the World Bank’s Doing Business indicators.

Corporate registry reform was the subject of the Pacific Business Registries workshop in Auckland in March, and part of the larger Corporate Registers Forum.

Sixty workshop participants from eleven countries across the Pacific, Myanmar and Timor-Leste met to discuss their progress in updating business registries.

The reforms aim to improve the livelihoods and economic well-being of those in the Pacific. Downstream benefits include improvements to the enabling environment for business, increased transparency, and added credibility to local businesses wanting to work with international companies or seeking finance.

Secured transaction registries also play an important role in credit in the Pacific, given the complexity around using land for collateral.

The workshop facilitated discussions around challenges and achievements.

Payment methods were raised as a problematic area by several Pacific countries, with some breakthroughs such as that by Papua New Guinea, which is taking an innovative approach to its registry by incorporating mobile technology for making payments and accessing the registry.

A number of representatives noted the implementation effort required in training users and convincing stakeholders of the benefits. But there was obvious upside too.

Samoa, which launched its Company Registry in late March, said the beauty of the system was that everything was at their fingertips.

There was real enthusiasm from Pacific delegates for progressing business registries.

The Asian Development Bank and New Zealand Companies Office are working to put in place online companies registries and secured transactions registries, with the New Zealand Aid Programme providing support to the Cook Islands and Samoa, and IFC providing support in Papua New Guinea.

The United States Government today announced the Climate Data initiative, which aims to help communities use public data to better understand the impacts of climate change.

The initiative has been supported by industry including Google, Microsoft, Intel and ESRI who will provide resources and infrastructure to allow researchers to develop monitoring and mapping products from data made available as a result of the Climate Data Initiative.

At the launch, Google committed to making information such as sea-level rise, storm surges, extreme heat and drought as publicly accessible as driving directions on Google maps.

Donating substantial cloud computing and storage resources Google challenged the global community to build an accessible high resolution digital elevation model (DEM) of the entire Earth’s land surface and shallow oceans.

For low-lying coastal communities adapting and building resilience to sea level rise relies upon access to accurate information on elevation, storm surges and coastal inundation.

Australia’s contribution in modelling these impacts for our Pacific neighbours has been recognised in a major announcement made by Google.

Googles announcement at the White House showcased the high resolution DEM and visualisation tools developed for Vanuatu by the Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information (CRCSI), with partners Geoscience Australia and NGIS Australia on behalf of the Australian Government.

This work leveraged the expertise built on the significant investment the Australian Government has made in developing a high resolution LiDAR (laser-based) DEM and visualisation tools covering Australia’s populated coast.

At only a few metres above sea level the main commercial centres of Vanuatu, Port Vila and Luganville are highly vulnerable to flooding from sea level rise, tropical cyclones and storms.

The Australian partnership is recognising the importance of protecting communities and key infrastructure, through modelling and mapping the areas at risk of inundation.

This was the first time Vanuatu and many other South West Pacific island countries, including Tonga, Samoa and Papua New Guinea had access to detailed information on the impacts of storm surges and sea level rise to help them adapt to current risks and plan for the future.

Google has specifically noted the work of the CRCSI and its partners and invited governments, scientific, research and commercial organisations, to share their data and contribute to the global DEM.

“We welcome Googles commitment to providing cloud computing and storage resources for a global high-resolution DEM and we look forward to collaborating with organisations worldwide, sharing our experiences and expertise” said Peter Woodgate, CEO CRCSI.

Googles commitment is significant as airborne LiDAR is considered one of the leading technologies which can effectively map the risks and potential impacts of sea level rise at the required level of accuracy, creating enormous computing challenges.

Typically, current airborne LiDAR datasets require more than 2 gigabytes of computer storage for every square kilometre..

With hundreds of thousands of square kilometres of low lying coastal areas, the challenge of acquiring, storing, analysing, disseminated and visualising these data is immense.

About the CRCSI The CRCSI is an unincorporated joint venture set up under the Cooperative Research Centre Program of the Australian Commonwealth Government.

The purpose of the CRCSI is to build critical mass in research ventures between end-users and researchers tackling clearly articulated, major challenges for the end-users using the fundamental spatial technologies.

The CRCSI brings powerful collaboration on all critical research and education issues that involve a spatial aspect.

In doing so the CRCSI seeks to accelerate the take up of spatial science in key end-users, spawning major innovation and productivity advances in the key industry sectors of Health; Defence; Energy & Utilities; Sustainable Urban Planning; and Agriculture, Natural Resources and Climate Change.

There is nothing more confidence inspiring than getting out on a rugby field for the rugby season wearing a brand new jersey, shorts and shoes.

That will be the feeling during this year’s rugby season after the Lepea Rugby team were presented with new uniforms on Friday evening at the Lepea Malae from their Sponsor Lady Elizabeth.

The sponsor represents Mulipola Lauina and wife Elizabeth who live in New Zealand.

A representative of the sponsors Leuta Solomona confirmed the new uniforms were worth NZD$ 10,000 - equivalent to ST$20,211.88.

Prior to the presentation of the uniforms to the paramount chief of the village Vaitagutu Viliamu Masoe she challenged the rugby team to be true “and honest to your trainings”.

“That [request] is not for the good of us sponsors but for your own goods.”

She told them that it was important that they were committed to their trainings because it would ensure a bright future for them.

A future for the village, their families and church, said Ms Solomona.

“Pray to God that he will continue to give us strength so that we can continue to sponsor your team.”

Families, friends and classmates from 2006 to 2008 of Aana 2 College were in mourning at the Christian Church of Samatau last Friday for the funeral service of Siaki Togia Tuala

Mr. Tuala drowned at sea, while free diving for fish, two weeks ago. In his service, his mother, Faleoo Togia, said that her son was a smartest one, but he did not want to work in a town job.

Mrs Faleoo said Siaki told her, that fishing is better than working in town, that there was more income for his family.

Weeping, she said she was not feeling sad because she missed her son but because she loved him so much.

After the service conducted by Rev. Livigisitone Toelupe, followed by the last service at his grave.

Siaki is the third child from eight.

Speaker La’aulialemalietoa Leuatea Polata’ivao reminded yesterday that the running of Parliament is done according to the “authority” vested in him.

Said he: “Our aim is commit everything to the Lord but (when it comes to) the planning and programmes (of things in the House); that is my discretion.

“The Order Paper is planned out using the authority of the Speaker.” La’auli made the comment in response to questions raised by the leader of the Opposition Party, Palusalue Fa’apo II.

The Safata M.P. questioned the government’s promise to discuss the Officers of Parliament Committee report during the current session. The report in question confirms instances of “corrupt practises” within some government bodies that were highlighted by the Controller and Chief Auditor’s report. Minutes into yesterday’s Parliament session, Palusalue wasted no time.

“Mr. Speaker, you have laid down your plan and you have clearly spoken that there is no need to worry (in the absence of Prime Minister Tuilaepa) since Parliament is in good hands with the presence of the Acting Prime Minister, Cabinet, that side (H.R.P.P) and this side (Tautua),” said Palusalue.

“I have a question about the report from the Controller and Chief Auditor, especially the Officers of Parliament Committee that investigated it. I see from the Order Paper for today that this report is not there at all. Let me remind you that the country is waiting, this (debate) is what the country is waiting for.”

Palusalue argued that Parliament should explain why the report has not been discussed “since the country is silently praying that this report will be discussed.”

Speaker La’auli immediately intervened. “I understand your opinion,” he told Palusalue. “(But) what’s going on (then),” Palusalue fired back. “Are we waiting for the Prime Minister to come back?”

La’auli said this was not the case. He said Palusalue should have read his papers properly. “I thought you would have looked at the Order Paper handed to you,” said Laauli.

“Your claim that this report has been removed from the Order Paper is not correct. Look carefully at the page where it’s on. This House has passed the order of our work. So don't be alarmed, nothing has changed.”

The Speaker said the report in question “is not a matter that should be taken lightly by Parliament.”

“You know that we are all praying for a speedy recovery of our Prime Minister, he is the one that is mostly affected by this report because he is the Minister of all the Ministries you are accusing. That’s why you should stay calm.”

The Speaker reminded Palusalue that he also questioned “our prayer last week.” “Don't question God,” he said.

“Our aim is commit everything to the Lord but (when it comes to) the planning and programmes (of things in the House); that is my discretion. The Order Paper is planned out using the authority of the Speaker.”

The Speaker said Palusalue and his party should just get ready for the debate. But Palusalue wouldn't stop.

“Why then have you made it (debate of the O.P.C report) last?” he asked. At that point, the Speaker had had enough. He ordered Palusalue to sit down.

“Leave it to me to plan our work, the good Lord is not short of days.” La’auli said Parliament has at least “70 reports to look at” which means there is a lot of work to be done.

Earlier, Palusalue thanked Speaker La’auli for including Prime Minister Tuilaepa’s medical visit to New Zealand in his prayer.

“Thank you Mr. Speaker for your special prayer,” he said. “

Allow me to speak on behalf of our party to express our well wishes and best regards to the Prime Minister to get well soon.

“I also extend our best wishes to his wife and family in their role of looking after the Prime Minister. May God grant him strength so that one day soon we will be reunited here.”

Before the official part of the day started yesterday, the Speaker also cautioned Members of Parliament. “If anyone has the pink eye virus, you shouldn't be with us (here in Parliament),” he said.

“You all know what has happened with schools… we don't want the House to be affected. We have to be obedient to the doctors as the leader of the country has taken the lead by travelling to New Zealand (for medical treatment).”

Before the end of yesterday’s session, Acting Prime Minister, Fonotoe Pierre Lauofo, moved a motion for Parliament’s hours to return to 9am to 1pm, as opposed to last week where an evening session was held from 7pm to 11pm. The motion was supported and passed. Parliament resumes at 9am today.

Companies and contractors are breaking the law by not paying withholding tax, which could cost the government more than $10million in revenue every year.

And so are the government ministries, authorities and corporations who are not enforcing the law.

That’s what the Minister of Revenue, Tuiloma Pule Lameko, told Parliament yesterday, during the discussion of the Tax Administration Amendment Bill 2014.

Tuiloma was responding to questions from Associate Minister of Communication and Information Technology, Papali’i Niko Lee Hang, who said the issue should be explained.

“I’ve noticed a number of corporations who are no longer collecting this tax when contractors are paid for projects,” Papali’i told Parliament.

“What I want to understand is; what are the implications?”

The former Minister of Finance said withholding taxes should be deducted from the amount paid to contractors, for any project. The Corporation would then pass this money on to the Ministry of Revenue.

“When a contractor files for tax return, then it will be known if they should get a refund or pay more tax,” Papali’i said.

“From my observation, however, there are corporations who are not deducting these taxes and that’s why I’m asking.

“My belief is that these taxes should be deducted instead of paying them to contractors carrying our government work.”

Tuiloma agreed with Papali’i. “What the M.P. has spoken about is the truth,” the Minister admitted. He explained that the withholding tax should be deducted by the government from the cost of projects.

“But at the end of the year, after the annual accounts are done...that money could be refunded at the end of the year when a contractor files for tax returns.”

“So the statement (from the M.P.) is so accurate. We have also noticed that a lot of corporations are not deducting the withholding tax. It should be taken away.”

But Papali’i was not finished with his questions. “My next question is; what is the consequence for the Corporation that doesn't deduct this particular tax?

“I take it from the Minister’s statement that there are cases where this tax has been paid to contractors when it should have been withheld. Is the corporation breaking the law then?”

In response, Tuiloma said: “That’s absolutely correct.

This money should be deducted (by the corporation).”

Opposition leader, Palusalue Fa’apo II, demanded to know which contractors and corporations have broken the law.

“What was done to them?” he asked. “We know from the Chief Auditor’s report that there are companies who are not following the law but perhaps this amendment will stop this.”

Associate Minister for the Ministry of the Prime Minister, Peseta Vaifou Tevaga, dismissed the claim that contractors are breaking the law.

“It is not the fault of the companies,” he said.

“If a contractor does work for a corporation and they fail to deduct it, then it’s their fault. The ministry should deduct the withholding tax, deduct retention (before payment of the contract).”

Associate Minister of Police, Tialavea Tionisio Seigafolava, added another question.

“With every project, there is a contract signed,” he said. “The question is, if it’s not within this contract to deduct a 10 per cent withholding tax, what then?

“What happens when a company and a S.O.E sign a contract without a clause about withholding tax? Which of these is stronger?”

Minister Tuiloma in response said any company or contractor that doesn't pay withholding tax is breaking the law. Such a tax contributes more than $10million to government revenue every year.

Away from the withholding tax clause of the Bill, Palusalue used the opportunity to remind the government about the plight of businesses in Samoa.

“There is a submission by the Chamber of Commerce (to government) because of the burden of taxes they are facing and yet we all know that these businesses are struggling.

They have asked the government to reconsider the taxes they are paying. What is being done about this submission?” Palusalue reminded that the government harps on about the “partnership between the private and public sector.”

“The truth is that it is not a partnership at all; the government is competing with the private sector and as a result, a lot of small businesses in the private sector have been affected.”

The Bill has been referred to the appropriate Parliamentary committee.